{"id":4922,"date":"2019-03-26T09:22:11","date_gmt":"2019-03-26T13:22:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/anthroposophy.ca\/?p=4922"},"modified":"2025-01-19T17:09:15","modified_gmt":"2025-01-19T22:09:15","slug":"4922","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/anthroposophy.ca\/en\/4922\/","title":{"rendered":"The sensory migration from the real world to the digital world"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>The sensory migration from the real world to the digital world<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>An article by Chantal Lapointe on two lectures given by<\/p>\n<p>Philippe Perenn\u00e8s<\/p>\n<p>PART TWO<\/p>\n<p><strong>How can we counteract this sensory migration phenomenon?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The first thing we must consider in order to find ways of dealing with this situation is the fact that the child lives more outside the \u201cself\u201d than inside; that is to say that a child has not yet developed a large degree of self awareness. The following excerpt from a work by Adeline Dubreu-B\u00e9clin focussing on the effects of screen exposure on psychological development (in <em>L\u2019\u00e9volution psychiatrique 83 <\/em>(2018) p. 399-414), will throw some light on this situation:<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe emergence of thinking and the development of the psychological sheath require first of all a solid physical foundation. In order for the self to find its place in time and space, the child must experience \u201cholding,\u201d (being \u201cheld\u201d) by the parent. The child needs parental \u201cholding,\u201d but also must be given time to engage with the surrounding world through sense perception. The dominant factors in the young child\u2019s life are physical growth and the development of motor coordination. The entire psychological life of the child is expressed through movement, at least up until the moment when the ability to speak is acquired. The child\u2019s motor expression is of course a reaction to organic needs, but it is also the child\u2019s first way of communicating with the surrounding world. This interaction is vital to the formation of the sense of self as subject, and also to the creation of a \u201cspace\u201d for thinking. As the child stumbles along, exploring the surrounding world, motor intelligence is gradually raised to the level of mental imaging. Therefore, we can attest to the importance of the solid physical and rational foundations which lead to the development of the sense of the self as subject. This leads us to conclude that overexposure to screens at an early age, by disturbing this double developmental foundation, alters the emergence of thinking.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>This means in reality that in order to develop awareness as an \u201cI\u201d or \u201cself,\u201d the child must have the benefit of both sensory experiences and relations with human beings. This reality must absolutely be taken into consideration.<\/p>\n<p>Children are the future of humanity, and Perenn\u00e8s shares Saint-Exup\u00e9ry\u2019s view that: \u201cAs far as the future is concerned, the important thing is not to foresee it, but rather to make it possible.\u201d We must make it possible for children to develop, which means making it possible for something, or rather someone, that we do not yet know, to emerge. We have to commit to \u201callowing freedom to develop.\u201d But how? How can we allow a child to become what he or she truly is? We must start by not putting obstacles in the way of what wants to emerge, by not allowing something we would like the child to be or become get in the way of what the child truly is. Perenn\u00e8s explains that the three pillars of Waldorf education are designed to respond to that very need:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Cultivating a clear intention<\/li>\n<li>Developing manual skills<\/li>\n<li>Developing and educating all the senses<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><strong><em>\u00a0 \u00a0 1. \u00a0 Cultivating a clear intention:<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>There is a clear distinction to be made between the intentionality of the child and that of the adult. The child\u2019s intentionality is still more or less instinctual, and is closely linked to life forces: hunger, thirst, the need to feel safe, etc. And if this primitive instinctual intentionality, turned exclusively towards one\u2019s own self needs, persists in adulthood, it becomes a problem. Intentionality must of necessity evolve over the course of one\u2019s life \u2013 but towards what, and how?<\/p>\n<p>In the training course Rudolf Steiner gave in 1919 in Stuttgart to the teachers of the first Waldorf school, he spoke of how in the evolution of a human being one can see a certain interiorization of the will forces accompanied by a movement of feeling towards the thinking sphere. Insofar as we can consider feeling to be the \u201cmotive\u201d for willing, we can sense how thinking gradually penetrates and gives intention to the forces of willing. Instinct appears therefore as what we could call an \u201cinferior\u201d state of willing, and can be clearly expressed in the physical forms in which the various animals appear. In <em>Study of Man,<\/em>Rudolf Steiner points out how we see in the very bodily form of birds, bees, beavers, their instinctual ability to build their dwellings. He goes on to say that on higher level, even in some animals, the will no longer expresses itself as instinct, but rather as \u201cimpulse,\u201d which is more internal in nature, whereas instinct is driven by something external. On an even higher level, will becomes desire. Yet, even though \u201cimpulse\u201d is \u201cconstant\u201d throughout the course of one\u2019s life, \u201cdesire\u201d is not always present, \u201cit wells up and then recedes.\u201d Instincts, impulses and desires are manifestations of animal nature, which ceases to be the case when they are sufficiently internalised to be perceived by the \u201cI\u201d, and although animals may have desires, we cannot say that they have motives. The highest forms of will are the \u201cwish, or desire\u201d to \u201cdo better next time\u201d (to improve oneself). A \u201cplan\u201d results when a wish\/desire takes on a \u201cclearer contour\u201d and aims at a concrete goal. The \u201cplan,\u201d after having matured for some time, then becomes a \u201cresolve.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>In order for this evolution of the will to take place, to become more human, less egotistical, more in tune with one\u2019s community, it must be carried within the hearts of the adults with whom the child is in contact, the adults that the child will imitate and take as role models. Educators, and all the adults in a child\u2019s surroundings, must be imbued with intentionality that is not animal in nature, but rather as human as possible. This of course requires that the educator\u2019s intentions not be determined by questions of money, but rather by more noble motives, until such time as the same intentionality can blossom within the child\u2019s own heart.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Of course, deep-rooted intentions can very well lurk far beneath the level of our normal consciousness. We are not always aware of why we do something or other, why we end up at a certain place. \u00a0And yet, the intentionality reveals itself in the very actions we take. Therefore, as adults, we must practice careful introspection. It behoves us to examine our actions to attempt to become aware of our deep-rooted intentions.<\/p>\n<p><strong><em>\u00a0<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<ol start=\"2\">\n<li><strong><em> Developing proper knowledge and skills<\/em><\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>What we do is who we are. Obviously, a child cannot look back over his life to discover who he is. Until such time as the child reaches an age where his or her own actions can become a defining life feature, a child defines his or her own being by what the parents do: \u201cMy daddy is\u2026 he knows how to\u2026 My mommy is\u2026\u201d. Writing one\u2019s own biography entails engaging with the world of time and space, and in order to do this, the child must experience the ability to make the surrounding real world move. Children who do not manage to make things work or move are fragile: they are either withdrawn or become troublemakers. In this respect, art activities and handicrafts are precious tools.<\/p>\n<ol start=\"3\">\n<li><strong><em> Educating all the senses<\/em><\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>The first thing we need to do is to become familiar with all the senses (see the explanatory note at the end of the article). The next step is to cultivate the senses, to care for their development. This is why more and more kindergartens and day care centres are choosing to locate in a natural setting (<a href=\"http:\/\/www.communityplaythings.com\/resources\/articles\/2018\/long-term-effects-of-nature-based-education\">http:\/\/www.communityplaythings.com\/resources\/articles\/2018\/long-term-effects-of-nature-based-education<\/a>).<\/p>\n<p>A fundamental characteristic of true perception of the real world is <em>coherence<\/em>. When a child picks up a piece of wood, he feels its weight, sees its shape, can taste it, smell it, explore the nuances of its various colours, make sounds with it, test its strength, etc. If Waldorf schools reject the use of plastic toys, it is because the child needs this coherence of perceptions that plastic does not offer: plastic objects all have more or less the same weight, taste, and uniform texture.\u00a0 External sense coherence fosters inner coherence.<\/p>\n<p>Thus, to counteract the effects of sensory migration, Perenn\u00e8s suggests that we put into practice the three pillars found in Waldorf education:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Clear intentionality to allow the child\u2019s own intentionality to develop,<\/li>\n<li>Development of manual skills<\/li>\n<li>Development of the senses.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong><u>Counter measures<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>These three pillars are of the utmost importance in today\u2019s world, although they seem to go against the generally accepted concepts held by current thinking and which Perenn\u00e8s brings to our attention. We only have to refer to the dominant role played by \u201cpublic relations\u201d as inspired by the ideas of Edward Bernays, who has developed a method based on the notion that in order for a democratic society to function properly, there must be an invisible form of government that decides for all its citizens while leaving them under the impression they are free (Edward Bernays, <em>Propaganda<\/em>, <em>comment manipuler l\u2019opinion en d\u00e9mocratie<\/em>, Zones, Paris, 2007, p.31.). \u201cThe minority,\u201d so he writes in his book <em>Propaganda<\/em>, \u201chas discovered that it can influence the majority in order to reach it own ends. It is now possible to mould public opinion and to manipulate the masses into using their own individual strengths to further the aims of the minority. And considering the way our current society is structured, this practice is virtually inevitable. Nowadays propaganda has become a necessary part of everything that is of any importance on the social level: politics, finance, industry, agriculture, charities and education. Propaganda is the executive organ of the invisible government.\u201d It was thus that Bernays was the first to use the methodologies of psychology, psychoanalysis and social science as tools for social manipulation.<\/p>\n<p>Perenn\u00e8s also draws our attention to another individual, B. J. Fogg, whose contribution is more recent and not to be overlooked. He has a PhD in Psychology and is the founder of the <em>Stanford Persuasive Technology Lab<\/em>where he experiments with the techniques of persuasion and seduction and has developed what he calls <em>Captology<\/em>as well as <em>Designing for Behavior Change<\/em>(Our goal is to explain human nature clearly and map those insights onto the emerging opportunities in technology. <a href=\"http:\/\/captology.stanford.edu\/\">http:\/\/captology.stanford.edu<\/a>Computers As Persuasive Technologies = CAPT. <a href=\"http:\/\/captology.stanford.edu\/about\/what-is-captology.html\">http:\/\/captology.stanford.edu\/about\/what-is-captology.html<\/a>, ) \u00a0\u00a0Captology is \u201cthe study of the use of computers as persuasive technologies. It includes design, research, ethics and analysis of interactive digital devices (computers, cell phones, websites, wireless technologies, mobile apps, video games, etc.) designed to influence peoples\u2019 attitudes and behaviour.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Fogg\u2019s approach is based on the equation: B = MAT (B = behaviour, M = motivation, A = aptitude, T = trigger). \u201cIn order to use technology as a tool for persuasion, it is important to become clear about what actually causes behaviour to change.\u201d And the three aforementioned elements: motivation, aptitude and trigger, \u201cmust all converge in order to produce a specific behaviour.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>According to Fogg, there are three components to <em>motivation<\/em>: immediate sensation, anticipation, and sense of belonging. There are two ways to enhance <em>aptitude<\/em>: \u201cYou can train people to gain skills. That is the more difficult way, persuading someone to learn new things. The best solution is to simplify the behaviour being targeted.\u201d As to the trigger, it can be \u201ca reminder, a deadline, etc. Basically, a trigger tells someone \u201cdo it now!\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Perenn\u00e8s sums this up by saying that in order to get a salesperson to actually go meet a client, for example, we appeal to the reptilian brain, the survival brain, by pleading necessity and urgency. Then, we appeal to the brain\u2019s limbic system, the emotional brain, and we give the final blow by appealing to the neocortex, the part of the brain that supports reflection. As far as aptitude is concerned, by making things as simple as possible, by making no demands, we do not foster the development of skills but create the impression that we do have skills. True skill development is biographical in nature, says Perenn\u00e8s, and requires bodily control. And the trigger is something that comes from the outside, a logo, a sense perception that causes something in the mind to click.<\/p>\n<p>With this approach, we make sure that it is never the individual\u2019s intention that takes precedence, or is even called upon. On the contrary, we appeal first to the individual\u2019s emotions and drives. And when Fogg speaks of intentionality, he means the intentionality of the programmers. (Intentionality is what distinguishes between a planned effect and a side effect of a technology\u00a0\u00bb, in B.J. Fogg, <em>Persuasive Technology, Using Computers to Change What We Think and Do<\/em>, Morgan Kufmann Publishers, 2003, p.16).<\/p>\n<p>In an article on social media and neuroscience published in <em>Science et Vie<\/em>, James Williams, an Oxford scientist now carrying out research into the ethics of attention, and who formerly worked as a Google advertising employee, explains: \u201cIn the short term, these tools distract us from the things we have to do. In the long run, this can distract us from the life we would like to live\u2026 These technologies appeal to our impulses and not to our intentions.\u201d (\u00ab\u00a0Netflix, Facebook, Google\u2026Notre cerveau adore\u00a0! (Our brain loves them!) <em>Science &amp; Vie<\/em>, No. 1208, Mai 2018, p. 77)<\/p>\n<p>And in video games as well, which has been one of Perenn\u00e8s\u2019 fields of research (Philippe Perenn\u00e8s, <em>Rencontre avec les quatre sens corporels. <\/em><em>La d\u00e9sincarnation par les jeux vid\u00e9o<\/em>, FESWF, 2006.), there is no freedom. The intention is always that of the programmer. One can only play the game according to what has been programmed, and the description always says: \u201cIf you want to win, you have to \u2026\u201d<\/p>\n<p><u>What to do in this situation?<\/u><\/p>\n<p>We must realise that each time a child is put into a true perceptual situation, every time the child is placed in a context where the perceptions come from the real world and not a virtual one, this constitutes a vehicle for incarnation, and the experiences will remain with the child. Therefore, we must create \u201clittle islands\u201d of meaningful activity. This means providing the child with situations geared towards reality, in which the child can perceive real things, \u201cBecause, when we truly perceive things, we are on the way to meet the world.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Philippe Perenn\u00e8s quotes the words of Robin Schmidt: \u201cUp until the present, it was always heaven that was transcendent. We had to transcend the earth and its conditions in order to reach heaven. The digital world is a world in which we live without our bodies. \u2026 The earth has become a distant place, foreign to us. It has become something we enter only by crossing a barrier, through practice, by willful decision. It is thus that the earth becomes transcendent.\u201d (Robin Schmidt, <em>Prendre le risque de l\u2019Autre. L\u2019\u00e9mergence de l\u2019hospitalit\u00e9<\/em>, Laboissi\u00e8re en Thelle, Triades 2017, p. 53-54)<\/p>\n<p>It is therefore a question of allowing children to experience <em>the earth<\/em>as often as possible, through mountain hikes, nature walks, or, very simply, by allowing them to play outdoors.<\/p>\n<p>Let us create little islands where experiences have to do with reality, experiences which will <em>make the future possible.<\/em>And in order for this to happen, says Perenn\u00e8s, we must develop a clear vision of the nature of a salmon! A salmon swims upstream against the current, and it is up to us to develop a \u201csalmon mentality.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>NOTE<\/p>\n<p>There is no consensus at present as to the actual number of senses possessed by the human being. It all depends on how the question is approached: visible organs, receptor functions, biological processes. Rudolf Steiner identified 12 senses that he groups according to their \u201cfields of experience.\u201d Wolfgang Auer explains that this point of view was first put forward by Charles Scherrinton in 1906, when he identified corporeal perception (<em>proprioperception<\/em>) as constituting a true sense (c. f. W. Auer, <em>Mondes sensibles,<\/em>Triades, 2009, p. 12). Maurice Merleau-Ponty thought along the same lines. R. Steiner considers a human sense to be \u201canything that allows a human being to recognise the existence of an object, a being, or a process in a way that he can legitimately place that object as existing in the physical world.\u201d (<em>Anthroposophie, un fragment<\/em>, Triades, 2008, p. 29). The twelve senses identified by R. Steiner are divided into three groups. The first group includes those senses by which the human being becomes aware of the body\u2019s existence; this is the field of <em>proprioperception<\/em>. These are the senses of touch, movement, life, and balance. The second group includes those senses which allow the human being to become aware of his surroundings: sight, taste, smell, and the sense of warmth. In the third group, he places those senses which are focussed on the inner life and \u201creveal what is hidden\u201d: hearing, the sense of speech, the sense of thinking, and the sense which recognizes the \u201cI\u201d of another human being. (c.f. Albert Soesmann,<em>Our Twelve Senses<\/em>). These last senses are exclusive to the human being and make it possible to reach the psychospiritual realm, to truly acknowledge the being of another person.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The sensory migration from the real world to the digital world An article by Chantal Lapointe on two lectures given by Philippe Perenn\u00e8s PART TWO How can we counteract this sensory migration phenomenon? The first thing we must consider in order to find ways of&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4922","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-public-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/anthroposophy.ca\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4922","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/anthroposophy.ca\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/anthroposophy.ca\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/anthroposophy.ca\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/anthroposophy.ca\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4922"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/anthroposophy.ca\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4922\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4924,"href":"https:\/\/anthroposophy.ca\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4922\/revisions\/4924"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/anthroposophy.ca\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4922"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/anthroposophy.ca\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4922"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/anthroposophy.ca\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4922"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}