From the World Society – On Sharing Our Voices

From the World Society – On Sharing Our Voices

Dear Members and Friends of the Anthroposophical Society in Canada

Perhaps one of our greatest challenges as contemporary human beings is a deep seated need to be right, and to have our perspective validated and accepted.

In recent centuries, as we unfold our individual consciousness, we have gradually developed faculties for which we can be deeply grateful. The evolving capacity for free and independent thought provides the foundation for meeting the world as a free individual. These evolving capacities challenge us when they descend into our physical constitution, becoming intertwined with our embodied experience of self. As these remarkable capacities become bound to the body it becomes increasingly difficult to separate our sense of self from our ideas. This can bring us to the experience of feeling threatened if our ideas are questioned, or if we are confronted by the thoughts of others that are not in accord with our own. This binding of thinking to our embodied sense of self is so familiar that we accept it as being innate.

Against this background we can be continually amazed by Rudolf Steiner’s capacity to free thought from fixed perspectives. We can be uncomfortable when he presents startlingly different perspectives on a similar subject. We can experience this as a physical dis-ease. If we attend to this we can become aware of how we have aligned our sense of what is “right” with only some of Rudolf Steiner’s indications, setting aside those that challenge us. Rudolf Steiner continuously invites us to break this binding of our thinking to our constitutions – that we freely think.

This unbinding becomes ever more difficult when seeking collective agreements. In this community setting we are inevitably confronted by the limits of our ability to enter into a creative thought process with others without our sense of self being affected. In order to feel well in our bodies we struggle to have our thoughts, our insights, acknowledged and accepted.

Rudolf Steiner treads another path. He invites multiple perspectives that only the individual can bring, but is also limited by. It is when the full constellation of points-of-view can be held that the group has the possibility of coming closer to the essence of what is being considered. We have the remarkable example of this with the Christmas Conference where each decision, that could have been made quickly if directed by Rudolf Steiner, was discussed at great length. Only after this extensive reflection were decisions made. A critical mystery aspect of this process is that these explorations were all framed by the Foundation Stone Meditation – that the formative principles embedded in it permeate and inform all these proceedings.

This ideal for a process of coming to agreements within the Anthroposophical Society has remained our guiding intention ever since the Christmas Conference. One key aspect of this process is the role of those representing others. He specifically speaks of this in relationship to the responsibilities of the General Secretaries who he reminds are there to speak for those who could not attend. This is a weighty responsibility for those who have the privilege to being present. At every step these “representatives” are called not only to bring their own thoughts, but to share the essence of the thinking of those not able to attend – even if these thoughts are not in alignment with their own.

This ideal is an intention for the future, that we are cultivating ways of working that stand on the wisdom of each individual – wisdom that can then be set aside so that those present, having built up a full picture, can “see through” to what needs to come about in that moment. This collective perceiving is a community process.

From the distance of a year, we can look back to the 2018 General Assembly of the General Anthroposophical Society out of these reflections. Were we able to truly hear each other and then to set aside the perspective we experienced as “right”? Were other forces active to interrupted this sacred space of speaking and listening?  This tension is profoundly uncomfortable, having an impact on members around the world who feel their voices were unheard. This discomfort triggers complex feelings and reactions. Feeling mute awakens a deep need to be heard and comes coupled with the will to have an effect. The inherited mechanism for doing this is the use of a “proxy” that has come to be a method for supporting, and voting for, a predetermined outcome divorced from what comes to the meeting itself. This can inhibit the very processes of sharing and listening that Rudolf Steiner asks us to cultivate, processes that would restore the proxy, the  procurare, to its origins – the one who cares for the concerns of the other.

As Canadians we face parallel challenges, ones we constantly try to negotiate. Within the context of our continent-of-a-country we seek ways of working that include us all.  Committing to our two languages, creating a Council of representatives spread across thousands of kilometres who meetings span the country, and Annual General Meetings held in different regions, are all efforts in this direction. Despite these efforts those who cannot be present can feel unheard, ineffective. In an attempt to hear your voice, while respecting the call to come to agreements in a completely new way, an effort is being made to create a vehicle through which you can share you voice and contribute to our common striving.

At the heart of this impulse is a request that we cultivate speaking with each other. Across the country let us hold conversations on the issues we will be considering in our Annual General Meeting – conversations between those who have the privilege of being present and those who do not have that possibility. Our hope is that by cultivating these conversations, and reminding ourselves that being present is a privilege and a responsibility, we can take a step forward to bring into our meeting the voices of our fellow members across the country – that your voice contributes to the constellation of perspectives out of which those present can listen through to a decision appropriate for all.

With warm regards,

Bert Chase

General Secretary for Canada

 

2 Comments
  • Diana Zinter
    Posted at 17:49h, 30 March

    Is it a ‘perhaps’ challenge or a true one? Once again, in the text of this address, I am asked to set aside my own human beingness- the beingness that can come to know (and indeed, must do in the course of evolution) the three worlds of sense, soul and spirit. With my evolved ego consciousness that has developed over time to now stand in the world to see the limitations of science, of religion, I can also see, feel and experience an Anthroposophical Society that does not see (does not want to see?) what Rudolf Steiner saw. I am asked rather to be continually amazed at Rudolf Steiner’s ability of free thought from fixed perspecitves.
    Fixed perspective is indeed a sense world reality. Freedom of thought in the thought world is the hallmark of any free being who is human that can encounter the Lesser Guardian at the edge of this sense world, to traverse the soul world, to encounter the Greater Guardian at the boundary of this thought world of the spirit. Steiner described this development through the feeling life in Knowledge of Higher Worlds. He described it through the thought life in Philosophy of Spiritual Activity. He revealed the will of it in the Foundation Stone Meditation that came in the Christmas Conference before his death from the sense world.
    The binding of the thinking to our embodied sense of self that is so familiar to us that we accept it as being innate is indeed a description of the thinking activity of the lower self. It does indeed feel threatened at every turn in the presence of another thought which is foreign to it. At this point, there is no difference between the lower self annihilation through votes or through guns. The accumulated mental pictures- from the karmic past, as well as the earthly present- will never find the free thought world that Steiner perceived, developed thoughts from, and then proceeded to share this knowledge of the Path of Knowledge with others who would ask the questions of past, present and future.
    Listening and Speaking become deeds when incarnated with will from the spiritual world, which happens only with my very own self- willed self-activity. Getting to en-willed Speaking and Listening will not happen from the self who feels threatened at the destruction of its own ideas. These ideas are indeed set aside- experienced as a death moment in the encounter with the Lesser Guardian- so that the birth of the higher self becomes both possible and necessary.
    A dissertation on the responsibilities of individuals in the voting process will also not help me to reach this in-tended goal of higher selfness. The placing of the clear boundary between all that is to the past and present and all that is to the future is the way to clarity- within an individual, between individuals, and between groups, no matter where they may be. Every human being has equal possibility to access the freedom of intuition consciousness, if they can successfully harness the soul forces of feeling, willing and thinking to become organs of perception in the spiritual world. It is at this time, and in this place that Knowledge arises, and then with all certainty and love, the deed that arises is the moral one to be done.
    Is the Society ready to birth its higher self yet?

  • Emanuel Blosser
    Posted at 16:34h, 01 April

    Dear Friends,

    In ‘Occult Science, An Outline’, Rudulf Steiner wrote in the prefaces:

    ” The author attempted to show that this experiencing of the supersensible, although acquired entirely through inner ways and means, does not have a merely subjective significance for the individual who acquires it. The presentation was to show that, within the soul, its singularity and personal peculiarity are stripped off and an experience is reached which is similar in every human being who effects his development in the right manner out of his subjective experiences. Only when the knowledge of supersensible worlds is conceived of as possessing this character is it possible to distinguish it from all experiences of mere subjective mysticism and the like.”

    Out of our individual subjective limitations there exists and there is a way to acquire and live with an objective knowledge that every human being can also acquire and live. In all of his descriptions of how to enter and acquire such an objective knowledge that is universal for all human beings, Steiner, describes individual inner processes that must be disciplined to follow what he calls in ‘Knowledge of the Higher Worlds and Its Attainment’, as “minutely prescribed” instructions. The soul forces of thinking, feeling and willing have to be turned from the subjective content that we have inherited from our karmic constitutions that can only be in conflict with each other to a content that has its source in this realm where human beings can experience and acquire knowledge that is true and objective for all human beings.

    Every attempt to build social life on knowledge and individual soul forces that do not have their source in the realm of the universal human being will always leave an oppressed unheard minority out of its decisions. Voting is always a suppression of a majority over a minority. The realm of the universal human being is the only place where every individual can come to seeing what action/decision, needs to live in the social life that actually includes every other individuality.

    This realm though has requirements to enter it. The realm of universal knowledge is separated from the realm of ordinary consciousness. Anthroposophy, Michael, and Steiner have all placed words into printed texts that teach of the existence of such a realm outside ordinary consciousness and of how to cross the abyss that exists between the subjective individual ordinary karmic inheritance we are each born into and the realm of universal cosmic intelligence. The realm of universal cosmic intelligence in which every human being can find their individual existence and intelligence harmonized with every other personal intelligence and earthly existence is divided from what karmic evolution now provides as bodily conditions and soul disposition,s by a realm in which the soul forces of willing, feeling, and thinking have to be purified from their subjective content into the objective content of the universal cosmic intelligence.

    This realm that stands between subjective personal bodily consciousness and universal cosmic intelligence is called the threshold. It is a realm, not a line. It takes time to cross it. There are many beings and cosmic processes to encounter during the crossing. There are judgements and commitments that have to be made. It has ladders that must be climbed step by step and chutes that return one to ordinary personal sense bound bodily consciousness whenever there is any misstep in developing the soul forces of thinking, feeling, and willing to conform to the content of the realm of universal cosmic intelligence.

    On the other side, Anthroposophy and Steiner describe in printed words, how when from the realm of universal cosmic intelligence that harmonizes all human beings and all cosmic beings, an individual human being decides to perform a moral deed on the earth, there is also a journey across the realm of the threshold. In this journey the reverse process occurs and the universal impulse is born into an individual body that can act upon the earth at a specific location and specific time. Michael’s words in his School of Spiritual Science that describe this side of human activity did not yet incarnate into the form that can appear in bodily spoken or printed words. Appearing in the forms of printed words in ordinary consciousness where selfhood can take hold them and awaken to and build higher forms of existence for itself, we have so far only the words of Anthroposophia and Steiner that describe this journey down into earthly initiative from the realm of universal cosmic intelligence.

    The words of Anthroposophia and Steiner propose that we can do deeds on the earth that have their source in the realm of universal cosmic intelligence and that such deeds will heal all the ills that exist in the cacophony of present earthly human affairs including, hunger, climate modification, war, economic security, …. The words of Anthroposophia and Steiner propose that they are the most practical, most successful way to solve all the practical problems that karmic evolution now presents in our earthly affairs. Everyone that now loves the words of Anthroposophia and Steiner feels the power of this proposal and has answered in their individual depths of soul, “Yes, lets do this. This is so important.” But of the 7.6 billion individual bodies now incarnated on the earth so few find this love of the words of Anthroposophia and Steiner. The rest feel the words of Anthroposophia and Steiner to be absolutely impractical and nonsensical.

    The words of Anthroposophia and Steiner in all their various presentations all say one thing. To be real they have to be lived. Study, enthusiasm, and memory are all inadequate. Thinking that a realm of universal knowledge exists out of which Steiner has given these words from capacities that are unique to his individuality and that we can put them into action by studying with the intellect that our ordinary consciousness has built from sense experience is inadequate. Feeling the hope and enthusiasm that grows up from reading Steiner’s words is inadequate. Holding in our cultural memory the tradition that is formed from Steiner’s deeds on earth is inadequate. To be lived means to follow these words to their source and become an individual being that can make the journey up and down, to and from, across the threshold realm to this source of universal harmonious intelligence.

    That voting affirmation was brought into the leadership of the General Anthroposophical Society in a new form in 2011 and that such voting terminated the continued leadership of those that proposed it and that now Paul McKay has presented a proposal to the 2019 AGM to remove this voting affirmation of the leadership only shows that the present leadership has not followed the required prescriptions to enter the realm of universal harmonious intelligence yet and so the words of Anthroposophia and Steiner are still only Steiner’s words and are not lived by the leadership yet. The vote at the AGM last year shows that the members of the Anthroposophical Society don’t yet all feel that what is being initiated by the Executive Council harmonizes all of their individualities. For me personally, it is embarrassing to introduce people to the ideals of anthroposophy and then have them meet and feel the conflicts that exist in the Society because there is no one other than Steiner who has real experience to do real deeds on the earth out of the realm of universal harmonious intelligence. I stand in the society as an individual who holds the indications given in the words of Anthroposophy and Steiner described above. These indications do not support the view that in ordinary consciousness since everyone has one of the 12 cosmic world views and one of the 7 inner moods that these views can be felt with, we learn spiritual activity by meeting these 84 points of view with openness and equanimity. The indications above propose that each individual has to get out of their ordinary consciousness, across the threshold realm with its judgements and requirements into the realm of universal knowledge. There the individuality can unite itself with all of these world views that exist in the incarnated earthly world. Individuality of the incarnated intelligence is formed out of the universality of cosmic intelligence. A universal harmony of knowledge is not possible between the incarnated world views that appear from the karmic past of the subjective individuality. Only when the ego strips away everything in itself, as the above quote from ‘Occult Science: An Outline’ describes, can it look down upon the earth and all the different views that exist there, can a harmonizing deed on the earth be created.

    Sincerely,
    Manny Blosser
    Edmonton, Alberta